One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
on the data? Opinions?BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> on the data? Opinions?
>|||OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?|||If you are talking about huge amounts of data, that require no
transformations, then probably BCP. Small data/ transformations probably
DTS. Try out both and see.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122401357.578369.275800@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
> the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
>|||BCP can be made to work between servers too but I came to know its not a
good practice.
Unc,
Refer this article to give you a head start.
http://www.mssqlcity.com/Tips/bulk_...ptimization.htm
"ChrisR" wrote:
> BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
>
> <unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
>
2012年3月27日星期二
bcp vs. dts, native sql bcp, text etc.?
One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
on the data? Opinions?BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> on the data? Opinions?
>|||OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?|||If you are talking about huge amounts of data, that require no
transformations, then probably BCP. Small data/ transformations probably
DTS. Try out both and see.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122401357.578369.275800@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
> the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
>|||BCP can be made to work between servers too but I came to know its not a
good practice.
Unc,
Refer this article to give you a head start.
http://www.mssqlcity.com/Tips/bulk_copy_optimization.htm
"ChrisR" wrote:
> BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
>
> <unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> > related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> > server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> > large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> > efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> > bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> > this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> > over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> > text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> > other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> > bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> > on the data? Opinions?
> >
>
>
related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
on the data? Opinions?BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> on the data? Opinions?
>|||OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?|||If you are talking about huge amounts of data, that require no
transformations, then probably BCP. Small data/ transformations probably
DTS. Try out both and see.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122401357.578369.275800@.o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
> the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
>|||BCP can be made to work between servers too but I came to know its not a
good practice.
Unc,
Refer this article to give you a head start.
http://www.mssqlcity.com/Tips/bulk_copy_optimization.htm
"ChrisR" wrote:
> BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
>
> <unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> > related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> > server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> > large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> > efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> > bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> > this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> > over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> > text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> > other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> > bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> > on the data? Opinions?
> >
>
>
bcp vs. dts, native sql bcp, text etc.?
One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
on the data? Opinions?
BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> on the data? Opinions?
>
|||OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
|||If you are talking about huge amounts of data, that require no
transformations, then probably BCP. Small data/ transformations probably
DTS. Try out both and see.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122401357.578369.275800@.o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
> the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
>
|||BCP can be made to work between servers too but I came to know its not a
good practice.
Unc,
Refer this article to give you a head start.
http://www.mssqlcity.com/Tips/bulk_c...timization.htm
"ChrisR" wrote:
> BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
>
> <unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
>
>
sql
related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
on the data? Opinions?
BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
> One of my upcoming projects is going to be to move some data & its
> related heavy processing off an production server off to a newer
> server, do the processing, and then move the data back. There will be
> large amounts of data going out & going in. My question deals with
> efficiency of this data movement. I read in BOL that for exporting,
> bcp is 3 to 6 times faster than DTS. But it didn't say whether or not
> this data was coming out of SQL Server to a flat text file or bcp'ing
> over to another SQL instance. So I'm not sure if I should bcp out to
> text, then bcp in to my other server...or just bcp directly to the
> other server. Also, I suppose I should not even consider DTS, since
> bcp is just as fast, and there won't be any significant transformations
> on the data? Opinions?
>
|||OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
|||If you are talking about huge amounts of data, that require no
transformations, then probably BCP. Small data/ transformations probably
DTS. Try out both and see.
<unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1122401357.578369.275800@.o13g2000cwo.googlegr oups.com...
> OK - now that I feel like an idiot.....Should I bcp out, then in to
> the other SQL Server, or would a DTS data move be more efficient?
>
|||BCP can be made to work between servers too but I came to know its not a
good practice.
Unc,
Refer this article to give you a head start.
http://www.mssqlcity.com/Tips/bulk_c...timization.htm
"ChrisR" wrote:
> BCP is used between a server and a file, not a server and a server.
>
> <unc27932@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1122399390.700953.95590@.z14g2000cwz.googlegro ups.com...
>
>
sql
2012年2月9日星期四
Basic question?
I have a new pc with xp on it,I have been coping data,files,projects,etc from my old pc onto my new over the network.
If I open Query Analyzer my databasese are there and it is all fine,but if I open ODBC I have no databases under System DSN.
How do I go about that,I have many databases and tables in it,is there a way I can refresh it or something,it would have to be something simple,right?
ThanksYou'll have to ReAdd the System DSNs through the ODBC control panel. DSNs are simply interfaces into databases. They don't contain data themselves, so you should be able to just add the DSNs back in (assuming you know all of the information necessary).|||Cool,thanks for that,that's what I thought but I wanted to ask someone first just in case.
If I open Query Analyzer my databasese are there and it is all fine,but if I open ODBC I have no databases under System DSN.
How do I go about that,I have many databases and tables in it,is there a way I can refresh it or something,it would have to be something simple,right?
ThanksYou'll have to ReAdd the System DSNs through the ODBC control panel. DSNs are simply interfaces into databases. They don't contain data themselves, so you should be able to just add the DSNs back in (assuming you know all of the information necessary).|||Cool,thanks for that,that's what I thought but I wanted to ask someone first just in case.
订阅：
博文 (Atom)